Vayigash |
||
Dr Annette M. Boeckler | ||
Reflections
Vayigash It is
Joseph’s story? Or is it Judah’s? Who really is the main
hero? Isn’t Joseph
rather a victim or at least only reacting to unlucky or happy
circumstances?
Judah’s actions and words however, move the story forward. Does
Joseph’s personality change during the story? No. Isn’t it,
that at the
beginning he wished to be adored, at the end he loves to be adored
(42:9). Does
Judah change? Yes. This week’s parasha is the proof. So who
actually is the
main hero of the story? Shouldn’t it be called the Judah-Story
rather than the Joseph-Story? The Judah
we encounter this week is not the Judah of the past weeks. Do you
remember: It
was Judah who suggested selling his then youngest brother Joseph,
“for what
gain do we have if we kill him. Let us make money with him.”
(37:26). The story
of Judah and his daughter in law Tamar, however, is the key to
understand Judah’s
change. He deceived Tamar and is deceived and humiliated. This changed
him. Tamar
changed him. (Interestingly Tamar’s son Perez will become the
ancestor of the
messiah, as we sing in Lecha Dodi: ben parzi.) From now on
Judah grows
in responsibility. It was because of his plea, that Benjamin
joined the
brothers to Egypt (43:3-4), he guaranteed with his life for his
youngest
brother (43:9). The story now suddenly speaks of “Judah and his
brothers”
(44:14) and Judah becomes their spokesperson for good (44:16, also
46:28). In
this week’s parasha Judah takes the full responsibility for his
family, which
finally leads to the revelation of truth: pharaoh is Joseph, everything
is
fine. It was
thanks to Joseph that Judah survived. This week’s Haftarah makes
it clear, that
Judah and Joseph stand for political entities, they symbolize the two
extremely
different antique kingdoms in Erez Israel: the northern Kingdom called
“Ephraim” or “Israel” and the southern kingdom
called “Judah”. In Judah only
kings from the Davidic line ruled whereas the northern kingdom Israel
saw many
dynasties coming and going; it was multicultural and very open-minded
towards
Assyrian and Canaanite cultures. However the northern kingdom Israel
had
prophets as Elijah and the books of prophets and the earliest
traditions about
the patriarchs originate here. The two kingdoms had rather not a
friendly relationship;
each one regarded itself as the true representative of
“Israel” or “the house
of David”. They treated each other like Judah treated Joseph in
his youth. (The
two books of kings tell the story of these two different kingdoms.)
Especially
the small southern kingdom of Judah looked arrogantly down to Israel
and
condemned its politics and behaviors and regarded its end by the
Assyrians as
God’s punishment for idolatry. The
Haftarah now teaches: both kingdoms belong inseparably together.
God’s eternal
peace and God’s presence will only dwell in a united people (Ez
37:16-17;
26-28). Till today,
both belong together: Those groups of Jews who assimilate and adapt and
change
and those who keep the traditional line. Judah would have starved
without
Joseph. But also: Judah needed to leave Egypt again to build the
identity of
the Jewish people. Judah and
Joseph/Ephraim are two extreme poles. It is their encounter that keeps
Judaism
alive and that makes us learn and develop responsibility and it is
their
respect and care of each other and will guarantee God’s peace and
presence in
Judaism. Dr Annette
M. Boeckler |
||
source: www.annette-boeckler.de |